Tuesday, 23 July 2019

Initiative Q – professors making fools of themselves

It's been well over six months since my review on Initiative Q so it's about time to have a look at what's going on with the scheme.

Below is the roadmap published on Initiative Q's website. According to the roadmap the recruitment campaign of the scheme is about to end. The next phase, starting in the mid 2019, should be development of payment network.

The roadmap of Initiative Q. (click to enlarge)

Initiative Q has been awkwardly silent ever since traffic to the website started to plummet after peaking in the late 2018. The latest post on the official Facebook page has been published in March 2019.

Google Trends show that there hasn't been much interest towards Initiative Q for about six months.

Professors making fools of themselves

On Initiative Q's webpage there are four people introduced as being the economists behind Initiative Q. They all seem to be real people.

The economists behind Initiative Q: 
Lawrence H. White, Professor of economics at George Mason University
Marc Rysman, Professor of economic at Boston University
William J. Luther, Assistant professor of economics at Florida Atlantic University
James Caton, Assistant professor of economics at North Dakota State University 

Being the economists behind this ridiculousness I'd sure like to hear them explaining how Initiative Q is supposed to work. After all, they are the ones giving their names and faces to this "self-fulfilling prophecy" that no-one should miss.

Let's go through some known facts that I find worth mentioning.

We don't know exactly how many people have joined the scheme by now. However, in November 2018 Initiative Q announced reaching 5 million users. At the time Initiative Q was giving away its future currency claiming that each position was going to have an estimated future value of over 19.000 dollars.

In January 2019 the website announced that over 6 million people had joined Initiative Q. At the time the scheme was gifting the people joining with positions of estimated future value of over 17.000 euros. An article published in early June let's us know that Initiative Q has 7 million registered users. Currently Initiative Q is gifting new members with positions worth about 16.500 imaginary dollars.

If I understood the system correctly each user gets 10 % of the currency reserved for a position just by joining. The rest must be earned by recruiting more people to join (and finishing possible other tasks).

This means that even with the minimum amount of the currency given to each member Initiative Q has given away its currency for a total amount of way more than 12 billion dollars – based on the imaginary value of the currency.

Whether there would be 7 million or even 100 million people as members is meaningless in my opinion. There would still be nothing backing up the value the project has self-proclaimed.

Although stupidity is an endless resource I find it hard to believe that anyone would take this scheme seriously enough to start investing real money in to this... Unless they would develop it into OneCoin like ponzi-pyramid scheme. Still, it would only be yet another scam.

Initiative Q celebrating reaching 5 million users in November 2018.

Screencap from the website in January 2019.

Now, I would really like to ask these professors of foolishness that how is this nonsense supposed to become a reality?

Meanwhile Saar Wilf goes Bzigo

The man behind the idea of Initiative Q, Saar Wilf, has been silent about the project as well. It seems that he has been lately more interested in the future of killing insects.

At first I thought this was a lousy and somewhat disturbing parody ad but it now seems that it is a genuine thing that Saar Wilf has put his heart and mind into:

The device is called "Bzigo". However, it does not kill insects but only locates them in a room and points them out with a lazer beam.

Well, I don't think that a device that is only designed to locate mosquitos is going to be a success, but then again I might be dead wrong and this might only be another self-fulfilling prophecy about to happen.

Wednesday, 19 June 2019

U.S. v. Konstantin Ignatov – a motion for bail pending trial

There hasn't been much news about the upcoming trial of U.S. versus Konstantin Ignatov yet. At the moment the only reliable source of information are court documents published online.

After a long period of silence a new court document was filed today. It's a "Letter" in support of Konstantin's motion for bail pending trial. This letter by defence attorney Jeffrey Lichtman isn't exactly a surprise move but the content of the letter is quite hilarious as it draws a picture of Konstantin as the most philanthropist guy with a golden heart. The letter goes on over 70 pages trying to convince the judge that a bail pending trial is in order. 

Among presenting other court cases to back up the motion the defence considers Konstantin doesn't pose credible risk of flight. To vouch for this the defence proposes some conditions to go along if Konstantin's bail were to be set:
"He would be released via a $20M personal recognizance bond, secured by $10M in cash and property put up by persons who have placed their unwavering trust in the fact that Mr. Ignatov will remain to face these charges."
– I wonder if that cash and property includes any money originating to OneCoin.

The proposed pre-trial release also include 24 hour armed guards at Konstantin's expense and isolating him to an apartment in the district and shared with his "pregnant girlfriend". Konstantin would also agree not to use cellphones and his location would be monitored via a GPS bracelet. – I don't know where Konstantin would get all that money for the guards. Maybe he will offer them onecoins?

The defence also seems to project that the fact that Konstantin got arrested somehow reflects his innocence. – Yet it's not like Konstantin turned himself in to sort things out. He also lied to border patrol agents upon entering the United States. I find it more likely that he was just pompous enough to make himself believe that he was untouchable. 

The motion includes over 20 letters by relatives and friends of Konstantin trying to appeal the judge. Many of them expressing an utmost shock and disbelief that Konstantin would even hurt a fly, let alone defraud people. Besides, how could Konstantin as an "animal lover" be guilty of wire fraud? It's also worth mentioning that one of the letters is from Veska Ignatov who has been involved in OneCoin scam. Yes, the very scam that the court case is about. 

Well, I'm pretty sure the prosecutor could easily collect thousands of letters speaking against those letters presented by the defence. 

Heck, I don't even know Konstantin personally but even I know that he's a liar. For example, quoting my blog post in October 2018:

Another one of Konstantin Ignatov's lies is a petty one in comparison, but it certainly doesn't lack in magnitude. On his Facebook post 30 August, Konstantin was boasting: "Being featured in one of the biggest magazines, with 10 million readers."

That was of course a lie. Numbers magazine has only 3.000 copies printed. In addition OneCoin had most likely paid for the article to be published. The company happened to be sponsoring the magazine at that time.

Konstantin Ignatov has also publicly claimed that there were only three people besides him who had seen OneCoin's blockchain. According to him these people were his sister Ruja Ignatova, his mother Veska Ignatov and the head of the (il-)legal department of OneCoin (most likely referring to Irina Dilkinska). Considering that OneCoin hasn't even had a blockchain to begin with the claim by Konstantin is absolutely incriminating.

Saturday, 8 June 2019

US Government: OneCoin didn't have any legitimate business activity

On January 25, 2019, Mark Scott's defence requested US prosecution to turn over any evidence that might speak on behalf of Scott not being aware of the criminal nature of OneCoin and thus the money laundering side of the business. 

As per the US justice system, the prosecution has an obligation to provide any potentially exculpatory information that may directly, or indirectly, rebut the prosecution's case to assist the defence in making its case.

The response by the US Government tells us about evidence of "direct communications between the defendant and Ruja Ignatova, one of the founders and leaders of OneCoin, in the months leading up to the establishment and use of the Fenero funds to launder the proceeds of the OneCoin fraud scheme".

Finally the US Government response concludes with lines that pretty much sums it all:

"The Government is not aware of any evidence that OneCoin was, during the relevant period, engaged in any legitimate business activity."

"While OneCoin Ltd. and its associated business entities on occasion contracted with legitimate service providers and vendors in orger to further the scheme, its core business of marketing and selling so-called "OneCoin trader packages" to its members was completely fraudulent."

Credits to Nickolay Stoyanov from Capital Weekly for the information.

OneCoin still luring victims to wire transfer money to company's money laundering program

International criminal organisation OneCoin/OneLife released a newsletter this week luring gullible people to donate money to the scam's money laundering program specifically endorsing bank wire transfers.

So it seems likely that traditional bank wire transfers still are the most important source of funds to the scam. The newsletter makes an extra effort to market bank wire transfers as the best option to choose from by stating: 
"One more great promotion has come back for 2 more weeks! Buy 3 ONEACADEMY Educational packages via Bank Wire and get 1 free!"

Of course no one in their right mind is buying those "educational packages". On the other hand the victims of the scam are buying these packages only for the sake of onecoins they will get after purchasing a package – or multiple packages.

To promote these packages as education is just ridiculous, and the fact that the victims of the scam are lured to buy several of them makes the whole thing just that more ridiculous. But like Konstantin Ignatov said: "The network would not work with intelligent people." 

Screencapture taken from a user account showing payment options of the shopping section of onelife.eu. –  Oops, sorry, can't tell the bank account details. Please, contact a scammer for further information.

If it's proven as a scam, it is a scam

After the results of the US investigation were published there's really no excuse for anyone with a faintest hint of common decency to promote OneCoin.

All things considered no legitimate business would even continue operating under these kind of heavy charges, let alone disregard all the factual evidence that revealed undeniably how OneCoin was designed just to defraud people.

That been said I don't think the remaining staff at the Sofia office have any kind of moral backbone whatsoever.

OneCoin ditched New DealShaker

On May 23 2019 OneCoin announced that the members should no longer use New DealShaker (aka DealShitter) plaform. Yes, the very platform that has been heavily promoted by the company and the members since the beginning of 2019.

Now the company requests everyone to transfer their deals from the New DealShitter back to the old DealShitter. As the announcement says this is all because due to "recent technical issues" which refers to the inevitable difficulties that accumulate from running a ponzi pyramid scheme.

According to US investigation of OneCoin and as many had suspected before, DealShaker platform was only designed to provide a cover to the ponzi business. A market place build on a ponzi coin just isn't sustainable.

OneCoin didn't have a blockchain, the coin had no real value and there wasn't going to be an exchange for the members to cash their possessions. Yet Duncan Arthur and his team were hired to manufacture a new platform to replace the old one. The only reason for this operation was probably just to distract the existing members from demanding an exchange to be launched. DealShaker gave the company and it's representatives an excuse for further delays. Thus there was also more time to milk money from new victims.

Duncan Arthur, the beloved Project Manager of DealShaker 2016–2019.

There has been some leaked correspondence suggesting that Duncan Arthur wasn't exactly enjoying much trust from behalf of the top leaders of the scam. The conversation between the parties turned eventually into quarrel and led the company abandoning new DealShaker, thus ending also Duncan Arthur's involvement in OneCoin/OneLife. (As a matter of fact he was already providing his services to OneCoin since October 2016 as the "Project Lead" of the old version of DealShaker.)

The developing team of DealShaker confirms that there is no blockchain

After Konstantin's arrest a report sent by a member of the DealShaker developing team has been circling around online. The message revealed that the developing team of the new DealShaker had found out that OneCoin had no blockchain. 

However, I find it hard to believe that the absence of blockchain came as a surprise to the team, let alone to Duncan Arthur who had been involved in the developing of DealShaker ever since October 2016. I'd suspect that the leaked report was an effort by the team to wash their hands of the scam and distance themselves from any criminal activities.

Update June 8, 2019

A Tweet by OneCoinInsider pointed out that the old version of DealShaker has in fact been integrated with OneCoin and CoinSafe accounts. Yet transactions haven't been visible on OneCoin's "blockchain" simulator that is running in the back office showing the members scripted data mimicking legitimate cryptocurrencies.

Duncan Arthur has been responsible for the developing DealShaker part of the business since October 2016. That certainly raises up a lot of questions regarding his role in providing those two shitty merchant platforms (the old and the new one) to the scam.

Monday, 6 May 2019

BunnyToken scam follow-up

It has been over one year since my latest post about BunnyToken so I guess it's about time to check out the current situation.

Apparently BunnyToken managed to get listed on an exchange called Yobit during last summer. I guess the scammers behind Bunny were already losing interest in the scam because they almost forgot to inform the investors about the news. 

Yobit doesn't seem to be too picky about accepting tokens on their exchange. Practically any ERC20 token will do so getting BunnyToken listed there wasn't exactly a great accomplishment. According to Bitcoinwiki "Yobit.net is a Russia based cryptocurrency exchange that is famous for its controversial nature." I did find some articles and posts online characterising YoBit in less flattering manner.

Posted on Facebook on July 2, 2018.

Shortly after getting listed on YoBit BunnyToken informed about getting listed on another small-time exchange, STEX (Stock Exchange).

I could not find BunnyToken on the exchange anymore. However, Google shows some search results indicating that the token in fact was listed there for an unknown period.

Also Coinmarketcap.com recognises BunnyToken. It seems that Bunny hasn't had much popularity in the market. The highest trading volume was reached in September 2016 going up to about 150k dollars. It has been a downfall for Bunny ever since and the current trading volume for the past couple of days shows 0 dollars.

Screencap taken on May 3, 2019. (Click to enlarge)

Who was behind the scam?

I had tried to find out who were the actual people behind this scam from the beginning. The team was all fake personalities and there was no information available of the people owning the company or who registered the website. I tried asking one of the advisors of the ICO, Alex Eikster, whether he knew who were behind this project. Eikster admitted knowing the people but refused to give any names.

Later I tried to contact all other advisors as well; Kira Queen, Nataly Gold, Katrin Tequila and Eva Berger. I wasn't exactly having high hopes of getting answers to my questions but at least Kira Queen was kind enough to respond... Well, actually she only dropped couple short lines and refused to give any names nor to give her opinion about BunnyToken after I gave her all the facts revealing it as a scam.

BunnyToken Advisors (click to enlarge)

The current situation of the scam

As I already pointed out, there seems to be no interest towards the token in the market. The token is practically absolutely worthless. The ones possessing Bunnies can't even use them anywhere because there isn't a place that accepts this scam token. As far as I know, there has never been a place to use Bunnies.

The last post on the official Facebook page of Bunny has been posted in January. The post was announcing the release of BunnyWallet on Google Play. As I'm writing this the app has been installed about 100 times. The PEGI rating of the app is 3, which is pretty strange considering that it's a wallet app for adult entertainment.

So it seems that this scam project has been abandoned and we'll probably never hear about it again. Once again scammers have learned that crime sometimes does actually pay. What comes to the investors owning all those Bunnies that were sold during the ICO, they certainly got screwed.

Thursday, 2 May 2019

Global InterGold continues changing banks like socks – Updated 15 July, 2019

(Posted 2 May, 2019)

Global InterGold seems to have gone to the similar path as OneCoin did with its banking. The scam appears to have tremendous problems keeping bank accounts despite using various shell companies.

The latest bank account the company had acquired via its shell company GIG Global Intergold Limited SRL lasted about two weeks until the bank account details were replaced just recently with new ones. There's yet again a new shell company presented to go along with the new bank account. The holder of the bank account is Global Intergold Spain SL. using Banco Santander in Spain.

Here are the new bank account details provided to the scam victims:

Recipient Bank:
Bank Address:
Beneficiary Address:
Calle Villalba Hervas Number 2 4 2 Santa Cruz de Tenerife 38002-Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
Beneficiary Account:
ES95 0049 0290 32 2613565441

If I understood the Spanish registry information correctly, the company was incorporated in late 2018 with an initial capital of about 3000 euros. The person running the company is Kontogianni Sofia who appears to also be in charge of Global Gig Holding And Business Group SL

Coincidentally Sofia Kontogianni (aka Sofia Leonidas Kontogianni) was also the owner and manager of Gold International Group Limited who was the shell company Global InterGold tried to use for banking scam money in March 2019. My records show that the bank account in question lasted maybe less than 2 weeks. Here you can find all the bank accounts Global InterGold has had during the time I have been observing the scam.

Update 9 May, 2019

I decided to test whether Global InterGold uses some other banks besides the one mentioned in my post above. International scams sometimes use different banks based on the region that victims of the scam use for registration.

While testing the registration system of Global InterGold I noticed that you didn't even need a valid email address or phone number to successfully sign up. Yet the registration form requires to fill up some nonsense to those fields.

Global InterGold seems to prefer Banco Santander at the moment for most regions but there are also some other banks used. For example Indian victims are directed to use a bank in Turkey. Anyway, here are the results of the bank accounts for different regions I managed to find so far:

This bank for example victims from India:

Recipient Bank:
Bank Address:
Beneficiary Address:
Mecidiyekoy S.Ertugrul Kabatas Cad. No:7/4 Sisli/─░STANBUL, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
Beneficiary Account:
TR59 0006 4000 0021 0351 4425 52

These banks for example victims from Africa:

Recipient Bank:
Guaranty Trust Bank Plc
Bank Address:
Beneficiary Address:
The Concordia, 256A Ikorodu Crescent, Dolphin Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos, Nigeria
Beneficiary Account:

Recipient Bank:
Guaranty Trust Bank Plc
Bank Address:
Beneficiary Address:
The Concordia, 256A Ikorodu Crescent, Dolphin Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos, Nigeria
Beneficiary Account:

Recipient Bank:
Bank Address:
Beneficiary Address:
Calle Villalba Hervas Numero 2 4 2 Santa Cruz de Tenerife 38002-Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
Beneficiary Account:
ES68 0049 0290 30 2813566057

Bank account for victims from Latin America:

Recipient Bank:
Bank Address:
Beneficiary Address:
Calle Villalba Hervas Numero 2 4 2 Santa Cruz de Tenerife 38002-Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
Beneficiary Account:
ES68 0049 0290 30 2813566057

For victims from USA:

- Only Bitcoin accepted. – Yeah, nothing fishy going on here. :D 

Update 3 June, 2019

The Nigerian bank accounts of Guaranty Trust Bank Plc have been removed just recently from the list provided to the victims of the scam for wire transfers. The bank account of Banco Santander remains for some reason. Let's see how long that lasts.

Update 4 June, 2019

The Nigerian bank accounts of Guaranty Trust Bank Plc have emerged back to the bank account list. Well, it's Nigeria after all, the home of the infamous Nigerian prince.

Google Maps shows this fine residence at the address of the beneficiary of the bank account:

INTERMETAL TRADE and EXCH CO LTD, The Concordia, 256A Ikorodu Crescent, Dolphin Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos, Nigeria. (Click to enlarge.)

Pretty impressive! That barbed wire really convinced me that there's international investment gold business going on behind the fences.

Update 24 June, 2019

The Nigerian bank accounts of Guaranty Trust Bank Plc have been removed again from the list of bank accounts. Banco Santander still remains.

Update 15 July, 2019

Shortly after removing the bank accounts of Guaranty Trust Bank Plc a new Nigerian bank account has been just recently listed. The scam still uses the same Nigerian shell company, Intermetal Trade and EXCH(ange?) CO Ltd, who holds an account in Access Bank Nigeria PLC.

Bank Address:77 Obafemi Awolowo Way (MAN HOUSE), Lagos State, Nigeria.
Beneficiary Address:The Concordia, 256A Ikorodu Crescent, Dolphin Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos, Nigeria
Beneficiary Account:0811878863

Strangely Banco Santander seems to still be available for the scam.

Monday, 15 April 2019

OneCoin's hidden banking channels

This post is actually about some old information that has remained somewhat hidden. Nevertheless, there seems to be interesting connections of people and companies involved, and also information  how money transfers to OneCoin were arranged at the time the scam ran into serious troubles with its bank accounts.

As many of you readers might already know, in the end of 2016 OneCoin had to quit publishing any bank account information because the banks in question were immediately alerted about the accounts related to the international ponzi-pyramid scam. This usually led quite fast to bank account to be frozen or at least investigated by the bank due money laundering suspicion. The fastest freeze of an account happened in about 24 hours after OneCoin had released the account details.

Supposedly the everlasting problems with bank accounts led the scammers to open alternative routes to scam money from victims. These bank account details were not easily accessible by logging in to the back office online. Instead the information had to be acquired from some sort of trusted source. A trusted source was a OneCoin scammer or an IMA (Independent Marketing Associate) that the company trusted or a third party company providing bank account details to the victims via IMA's.

However, keeping those bank accounts hidden was not so simple as there was masses of greedy MLM people trying to become millionaires. There also has been some good samaritans snooping around information about the scam. Hence there has been bank account details leaking to the Internet every now and then.

Trade Solutions Group

Trade Solutions Group was a company providing bank account information to OneCoin victims via various websites. These websites were designed to give specific instructions how to transfer money in exchange for a membership in OneCoin. 

The CEO of Trade Solutions Group was and still is Herve Lacorne. On his LinkedIn profile Lacorne lists as his specialities "global payments, foreign exchange, trade finance, Technology". He has kept his distance to OneCoin and has been rarely seen among prominent promoters of the scam. Interestingly Lacorne goes way back with Chris Principe, who has had an affection towards OneCoin for years.

Chris Principe and Herve Lacorne

Chris Principe has been featuring as a speaker at numerous OneCoin events, giving his blessing to the scheme and going as far as publishing an awkward issue of his Financial IT advertorial magazine that was only designed to be used as a marketing tool of the scam. On his resume at Remote.com Principe lists Transaction Banking of Trade Solutions Group starting from June 2014 and lasting to the present. 

Chris Principe

Chris Principe on Remote.com (screencap taken 12 April, 2019.

Juha Parhiala, Herve Lacorne, Sebastian Greenwood and the "number 1 chryptocurrency".

"When a government decides to devalue their currency everybody gets hurt. If you're in OneCoin your value stays true. You don't lose your value." 
– Chris Principe 

"If you look at the journey that has happened over the last year and a half with OneCoin, it's amazing... er, quickly... and the performance of this currency and company. And this is all to the credit of Mr Juha, Mr Sebastian and Dr. Ruja that have done an outstanding job in building a huge community, and building the future of the currency, the future of payment." 
– Herve Lacorne

Although Lacorne hasn't been much of a public figure of OneCoin, there is at least one event in Cambodia in 2016 where Lacorne was speaking very fondly about OneCoin besides Principe. Here's the whole event on YouTube:

– I have also downloaded the video in case it gets removed from YouTube.

But let's go back to Trade Solutions Group and to the money transfers.

In the late 2016 several websites were found that were providing information to OneCoin victims about how to proceed with payments in order to purchase various packages the scam had to offer. Several (if not all) of the domains were registered to Trade Solutions Group. 

I believe none of those websites are reachable anymore. It's also unclear how long these websites were operational and how successful they were at channelling the money flow. Nevertheless, the purpose of these websites was very clear – to offer an additional banking route to scam money towards OneCoin.

Screencap from the comments section of BehindMLM

The websites didn't offer an online service of payment but generated an invoice instead, directing to a certain bank to proceed with a payment. There were also different websites depending on the currency used.

Before an invoice were to be generated one had to agree with the following terms specifically forbidding the use of word "OneCoin" while organising the payment: 
"I understand I am not purchasing an investment of any kind. I understand this is solely for the purchase of an education package(s). I understand that I am NOT ALLOWED to use the words : One Coin, Bit Coin, Digital, Crypto, Currency, Investment on ANY section of my purchase process or my money will be rejected. I acknowledge that doing so may cause my purchase to be rejected and my funds may be returned to me. I agree to leave all fields blank under the notes and description/name section of my purchase process when submitting: a bank wire, an ACH, or deposit at a branch. I understand I am not required to state anything so there's no reason to state unnecessary details. If I do have to state the purpose of my purchase or transaction I will just state "Education Course". If I am asked by any bank employee what the purpose of my transaction is, I will be truthful and tell them that I am purchasing education materials. If I violate any of these conditions I understand that I will not be allowed to utilize this domestic purchase system any longer. Tick the box to confirm that you have read and agreed to the above conditions. YES I have reviewed all information submitted in this form and agree that all information is correct. I understand that all communication will be sent to the email address I have provided and I should check my email regularly for updates and information." 
– Well, why would Trade Solutions Group / Herve Lacorne insist following these kind of terms?

A sample of an account and instructions used: 
BANK ACCOUNT INFO FOR WIRE - DO NOT SHARE THIS INFORMATION, IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGEBeneficiary Bank: ANZ Bank, MelbourneBeneficiary Bank SWIFT Code: ANZBAU3MBeneficiary: Compass Global Holdings Suite 33, 650 George St Sydney NSW 2000Beneficiary Account No.: 531160EUR00001Intermediary Bank: Deutsche Bank, FrankfurtIntermediary Bank SWIFT Code: DEUTDEFFXXXAdditional Information: Ref. ML-Moonlearning (your invoice number)SEND in EUR and DO NOT CONVERTInstructions are only usable for EURO transfersSend by "international wire" if unable to send by using Euroland national system

Another sample: 
Account name: Compass Global Holdings Client AccountMacquarie Bank Limited Level 5, 1 Martin Place Sydney, NSW 2000BSB:182 800Acc: 10229427Swift: MACQAU2SXXXRef: ACCT488656 - (Client Name) - Order #1000000012 (invoice number)Beneficiary address: Suite 33, Level 3 650 George Street, World Square Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia 
– Apparently at least some of the payments were directed to a "client account" of Compass Global Holdings.

This sample instructs to address the payment to CoPilot Ventures Fund II: 
Beneficiary: CoPilot Ventures Fund IIBeneficiary Address: 165 Horton Ave, Lynbrook, NY 11563Beneficiary Phone: 516-400-9770Beneficiary Bank: BB&TBeneficiary Bank Account Number: 256649934Beneficiary Bank Routing Number: 053101121Beneficiary Bank SWIFT Code: BRBTUS33Beneficiary Bank Address: 200 West Second Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA

I also recall one instruction – it was maybe for Vietnamese people – that offered only a phone number to a Asian woman to reach in order to acquire further instructions how to operate towards payment.

Trade Solutions Groups on LinkedIn.

Life after OneCoin

I guess that after Principe saw the success of OneCoin he got inspired to start a business of his own. A "referral company" called Solidus was launched somewhere in mid 2018. He even chose to appoint his old buddies from OneCoin, Jorma Pallari and Juha Parhiala, as ambassadors of Solidus. Juha Parhiala was touted as the top earner of OneCoin/OneLife when the pyramid was still blooming.

Chris Principe the CEO of Solidus and the Ambassadors, Jorma Pallari and Juha Parhiala.

And what about Herve Lacorne? According to BehindMLM's post about Solidus on September 18, 2018:
"Two months ago Chris Principe interviewed Herve Lacorne, then CEO of WinstantPay. The interview itself is nothing remarkable, but a few months later WinstantPay has emerged as Solidus Global’s payment processor. Since then Lacorne appears to have been downgraded to WinstantPay’s Chief Innovative Officer."

I haven't followed Solidus much. They have organised weekly webinars that haven't had much audience, maybe only twenty or so people attending. The webinars that I attended were brief and more or less awkward with nothing much to say. It seems that Solidus hasn't exactly been a gold mine so far. The Alexa rating of the website isn't flattering, which indicates that there isn't much traffic to the website:

Screencap taken 15 April, 2019.

Maybe it's not just me who wouldn't recommend even to a worst enemy anything these people were offering?